Patient and Professional Development Assignment Essay

on that point is considerable examine that many of the raw(a) medical technologies atomic number 18 drilld wrongly, to start income. What patient hold dearions against inappropriate symptomatic and otherwise procedures should be considered?thither is no doubt that the new diagnostic and cure engineering science now open has vastly expanded the stinting dimensions of medicine, at that place is evidence that new and expensive technologies atomic number 18 being used unsuitably to generate income. One example of this statement would be the use of magnetic resonance visualize or MRIs. The popularity of this testing has skyrocketed and has in flip been found to be very juicy for hospitals and outpatient facilities. Despite the swooping popularity and booming financial march on this testing has been found not to beat stird patient resultant roles. The testing gives suppliers a perish take care at the disease or anatomy being s peakned there argon no controlled comp arisons of diagnostic accuracy or changes in medical or therapeutic c are for patients (Sultz and Young, 2011). Therefore this new and advance(a) testing only adds to the cost of the already terribly high dollar of health care.Physicians now have many alternatives to amaze and many opportunities to generate income through the use of these and many more new technologies two in the office and hospital settings. The growth is that medical indications for the use of a good deal of the new technology are not merely causing conundrums and susceptible influence by economic factors. The range of acceptable options in a given case is lots wide enough to give the provider considerable latitude in his/her choice of procedures. It is in this gray zone that economic incentives have their greatest effect on medical behavior (Relman,2011). I do not intend that providers make decisions base on economic consideration and outcome that they would not decide otherwise. I believe with whol ly of my heart that for the most exposit providers do things the majority of the time to do right by the patient and the pocketbook. The problem is, however, the right thing is often a matter of opinion because many tests, procedures, and operations have not yet been to the full evaluated or scientifically compared with other forthcoming mea legitimates for cost effectiveness.Is it possible though tweet of financial advantage often sways those charitable providers or is it hardly to pacify or satisfy patients? To expand on heartsease or ecstasy or patients I go out use my area of expertise. I have worked in the area of womens health most of my career so though I am sure there are other areas of fortissimo with patients such as ours I can only state from true take care that this is a very high-maintained population. This is a media savvy, eddy driven patient population that often wants drive-thru service. The issues I see to often are the say of tests, labs, procedures t hat whitethorn be unessential or cause greater consequence. There are high-technology screenings for every atypical cellphone we could possibly have on a female reproductive organ. As before long as a pre-menopausal women with heavy bleed hears that she may have a substantiative result she wants a hysterectomy. Though this may be the treatment for some, it is not for all and I see way too many women loose their uterus for reasons that were much more benign than the outcome.Being in healthcare for so many years I could give example later example of new high technology that may be used inappropriately for reasons that could be generating income, exactly done simply for the benefit of the patient and their gaiety. Patient satisfaction brings a whole new upshot of conversation to generating income. So how can we protect patients from potentially themselves or those that provide the ordering power that initiates this vicious cycle? I think first we have to economy facilities and practices to put in place guidelines and protocols to stop unnecessary testing that has been shown not to change the patient outcome. Another intervention and rampart to patients is that providers have to have conversations with patients honestly round what the issue is and that they do not look at particular testing if asked for.They need to take note it real with patients. It is true that patient satisfaction is going to be at dangerand that they may want to jump providers, but providers and facilities will need to seriously look at the risk benefit of doing procedures that will not weigh up in a court of law or a court of public opinion. In spite of nursings critical importance to hospitals, nurses face excessive paperwork, managerial responsibilities, and supervision of lesser-trained aides tasks that require an immoderate amount of time spent in functions other than direct patient care. These frustrations, feature with long work hours, stagnant salaries, and other difficulties, have resulted in fewer entrants to schools of nursing and increasing numbers of nurses leaving the profession. establish possible solutions to this growing problem.Do providers in the health care system actualize a broader social mission than addressing the call for of only those individuals who achieve access to their service? Elaborate.Relman, A. (2011). Cost control, doctors ethics, and patient care. Retrieved from http//www.issues.org/19.4/updated/relman.pdf.